venerdì 25 febbraio 2011

Theatre Performance & Production Presentation

Today, the 25th February 2010, I assisted to Nima's TPPP.
It was good. I like it. I haven't seen others TPPP yet, but I think it was very personalize and it covered briefly all his experience with theatre.

What is TPPP?
TPPP is when you speak for 20 (SL) or 30 (HL) minutes about your whole theatre year. The presentations are spread throughout different classes. It is acompanied by a set of images (no larger than A4) in any way you want (7-10 HL, 5-7, SL). This can mean a powerpoint slide show or just plain old paper printouts. The project will focus primarly on the performance I was involved (1st and 2nd year production) or I have seen (Yerma). Theater in the making, theatre in performance and theatre in the world. Don't focus on IP because I'm already going to write an Independent Project Portfolio.
It is good to talk about my ideas in relation to the productions, as well as the insights or concerns, or even both, that came up throughout the productions. I should use the images to help emphasize some of my points; The images can also function as an abstract or symbolic parallel narrative to the oral content of the presentation.

IDEAS FOR TPPP:
- picture: War Horse, 


giovedì 24 febbraio 2011

Research Investigation

It's time to start thinking about what to do for the Research Investigation.
After focusing on puppetry, we are now slowly moving to the different form of theatre around the world, in particularly those that are not familiar to us.
In the RI, which counts for our IB final grade, we are required to undertake a personal dramaturgical research into an unfamiliar theatrical practice which would (theoretically) contribute to the production of a play or theatre piece from this practice.

Since we actually have to write our RI in our second year, in order to be prepared for the real RI, and get to know what is required from us, Libby asked us to do a presentation, alone or in pair, and chose a topic that we might like to get to know better. Of course we can’t choose the topic we might to for the actual RI, but we can always chose a topic presented by somebody else. This exercise give us the opportunity to be more inform about specific theatrical practice that we find interesting and/or we might want to do in our RI.

There are two specific theatrical practices that I would be really interested to research on.

 
 v  I really find interesting traditional theatrical practices, particularly from the Asian region. I’m really willing to find somebody interested as well on this topic, particularly on Kabuki Theatre - Japanese traditional form of theatre (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67-bgSFJiKc) and Korean storytelling (Simcheongga), in order to be a couple presenting one of these topics.

  v  Another theatre practice that I think I’m really interested on, is German Expressionism. (Perhaps also Pantomime). I realize that I don’t know any thing about this movement and I would really like to know information about it.
From basic information, I can say that according to the German Expressionism, the play writer creates his/her own style, by using symbolism and mise en scène to add mood and deeper meaning to a play, concentrating on the dark fringes of human experience.
This aspect could be interesting to develop and use in my ideal IP “Just Life”, or in another idea of Independent Project I would like to focus on by taking into consideration Antigone, Bertolt Brecht version, and adapting it with the ideas I will come out with.

War Horse as an ispiration

Last week Libby showed us a movie, War Horse.

War Horse is a thrilling and spectacular production based on the celebrated novel by Michael Morpurgo.
The First World War is the backdrop for this tale of bravery, loyalty, and the extraordinary bond between a young recruit and his horse.
Actors, working with astonishing life-sized puppets by the internationally renowned Handspring Puppet Company (http://www.handspringpuppet.co.za/ - webmaster@handspringpuppet.co.za), take audiences on an unforgettable journey through history.
The play is now on the New London Theatre.

Why am I including this on my journal?
I didn’t see the play, but just by watching the movie that shows all the work they had to do in order to reach to that great result, I was impressed. I was impressed but what you can do if you really want it. At a first moment, I would have never thought that the idea of using life-sized puppets in a play with human actors would have work.
I’m really surprised, but, more than this, I’m motivated. In this last period we started talking about Research Investigation, and different assignment we will have to do next year.
A very important point, for this theatre course will be the Independent Project. It is not all about mark. I think that the Independent Project is when we have to come out with our own ideas and be creative, see what could work, try to realize a “dream”. In my case, this will be the first time I will be directing my own play. I really want it to be great and I will do my best in order to reach this result.

I haven’t started working on my IP yet; but I was thinking about a play that includes the novel Akara-Ogun e la di Benin City (http://www.gfbv.it/3dossier/vda/benin.html) and the story of somebody very close to me, who is “one of the many Akara” that are in our society. I’m not completely sure whether or not I’m going to do this project; but, since it is originally a very sad story, I want to use “irony” to tell it. I thought about the title “Just Life” some months ago, but now, I think that I would really like to include a life-sized puppet (giraffe or african animal) - (life-size money puppet, "alive" would be amazing, look if there would any chance to make it possible),  on the story. I’m not sure how I’m going to do this; perhaps I have a role for the teddy bear. He is a very old puppet who has had many different owners, he was the best friend of Akara-Ognu when she was young, and the only “person” she trusted. Akara is now nineteen and she is trying to understand herself looking back to her past and telling her story to the puppet, who she abandoned, when she grow up and became a “women” (prematurely).
Her teddy bear knows only the happy part of her life, her happy childhood; but now, she feels that she will feel better by sharing all her story and feelings with the puppet.  By the end of the play, she will grow up. She will realize that she still have to work on a lot of aspects in order to leave a better life; at least now she knows them.
They are several (2/3) people acting Akara-Ognu, (in the different stages of her life). One of the Akara-Ognu is the storyteller (puppeteer), who is going to tell the whole story sitting on the stage under the central spot light on the downstage. Brechtian style; she snaps the audience to reality. While she is telling the story, the other actors are going to mime/act on the stage.
Realistic story in contrast with the irony used to tell it and the presence of a puppet. Humor enters occasionally to give balance to the play. It still have to be serious and realistic, costanly send a message and (Stanislavski) the audience have to be "kind of personally involved".


Other style I would like to investigate on and perhaps use in my IP: Mime, Pantomine, Theater of the Oppresed (Augusto Boal), Absurd Theatre ...

Now, if this is what I want to realize, I have to start, keep on going, step by step. 
It's not going to be easy.

lunedì 21 febbraio 2011

Puppetry and puppeteers

Puppetry is a form of theatre or performance which involves the manipulation of puppets. It is very ancient, and is believed to have originated 30,000 years BC. Puppetry takes many forms but they all share the process of animating inanimate performing objects. Puppetry is used in almost all human societies both as an entertainment – in performance – and ceremonially in rituals and celebrations such as carnivals. 
Most puppetry involves storytelling. The impact of puppetry depends on the process of transformation of puppets, which has much in common with magic and with play. Thus puppetry can create complex and magical theatre with relatively small resources. 
Puppetry developed throughout the twentieth century in a variety of ways. Supported by the parallel development of cinema, television and other filmed media it now reaches a larger audience than ever. Another development, starting at the beginning of the century, was the belief that puppet theatre, despite its popular and folk roots, could speak to adult audiences with an adult, and experimental voice, and reinvigorate the high art tradition of actors' theatre. 
Puppetry is now probably more familiar through television than live performance, but this still flourishes throughout the world. In the world of theatre, puppetry continues to be influential, and despite its 'outsider' status acts as an invigorating and rejuvenating influence on its mainstream relative, and feeds through object and physical theatre many of the most exciting developments in contemporary theatre. 


Japan has many forms of puppetry, including the bunraku. Bunraku is the name commonly used for ningyo-joruri, literally puppets and storytelling; it developed out of Shinto temple rites and gradually became a highly sophisticated form of puppetry. Initially consisting of one puppeteer, by 1730 three puppeteers were used to operate each puppet in full view of the audience. The puppeteers, who dressed all in black, would become invisible when standing against a black background, while the torches illuminated only the carved, painted and costumed wooden puppets.
Bunraku today is enjoying a mild revival. In 1966 it gained what it did not have in almost 150 years when the opening of the National Theater in Tokyo gave it a permanent home. In 1985 this home moved to its origin, Osaka, with the opening of the National Bunraku Theater. Currently there are four performances each a year in Tokyo and Osaka plus a yearly travelling show. Still, though audiences are important, the aging of the all- important backstage workers - head carvers, costume makers, etc. - and the lack of people to take their place poses an increasing problem for the future of this 300 year old art form.


Indonesia has a strong tradition of puppetry. In Java, wayang kulit, an elaborate form of shadow puppetry is very popular. Javanese rod puppets have a long history and are used to tell fables from Javanese history. 
The Javanese Wayang theater was influenced by Indian traditions. Europeans developed puppetry as a result of extensive contact with the Eastern World. Some scholars trace the origin of puppets to India 4000 years ago.
Wayang is an Indonesian word for theatre (literally "shadow"). When the term is used to refer to kinds of puppet theater, sometimes the puppet itself is referred to as wayang. Performances of shadow puppet theater are accompanied by gamelan in Java, and by "gender wayang" in Bali. 
Wayang kulit, shadow puppets prevalent in Java and Bali in Indonesia, are without a doubt the best known of the Indonesianwayang. Kulit means skin, and refers to the leather construction of the puppets that are carefully chiseled with very fine tools and supported with carefully shaped buffalo horn handles and control rods. 
The stories are usually drawn from the Ramayana, the Mahabharata or the Serat Menak. 
The Wayang is a flat or round puppets used for shows in Java.The wayang kulit is the flat one and it is made with buffalo leather. They are maipulated behind a white screen with a back light, so the attendance can see them as shadow puppets. We were also introduced to other Wayang figures for Kancil’s play: mouse deer, mud puddle, tiger, snake (uncoiled and coiled), wasp nest, and wasp. 
Wayang is well integrated in Javanese society, and it is considered to be a highlight of Javanese culture. 
Wayang Kulit was already established in the East Javanese kingdoms one thousand years ago. 


The experience that I had with Indonesian Shadow Puppetry was very interesting and distinct. Sutrisno Hartana, the puppeteer, was very engaging. He and his family, composed by his wife and his two daughters, were literally a crew. While Sutrisno was performing, her daughters were ready to assist him and her wife was singing through the all performance.
The part I appreciated most was when he explained his job, generally the work of a puppeteer, in connection with the Java culture and tradition; he shared his culture with us. The way he explained this different topic was very simple, so easy to understand. Several times, I couldn’t find the connection between the different topics he was referring to; mostly because this shadow puppetry refers specifically to the Indonesian region, and in order to understand every single connection you first have to have a background on these topics.
Nevertheless, we all participated actively to his presentation by taking the role of the narrator, of different character, or of puppeteers, in short scenes.
I get to act the voice of a tiger, in a short story. It was actually fun, challenging and interesting. First of all, I noticed that, even if it seems easy, reproducing the voice of an animal is not always that easy; the work of the puppeteer on moving the puppets, telling the story and imitating completely different voice, is really hard. As Sutrisno, later explained to us, you need to train for a long time in order to be a good puppeteer and be able to improvise, as he can do. In his case, he was introduced to this culture since his childhood, since he was born in Java; but he later had to go to the University of Art in Java, in order to improve his skills a become a good puppeteers. Also the experience is something that makes the difference between a puppeteer and another.
Even if I kind of expected a more elevated form of shadow puppetry, in his performance, I like the fact that it was very energetic, passionate, and simple. By looking at the show from the puppeteer side, I noticed the fact that when Sutrisno was performing, he was not only a storyteller, but he also gave life to the puppets, embodying himself in them.
He introduced a story drawn from the Mahabharata, in a very funny way, sometimes (at the end of the performance), making some connection with the environment around him, Pearson College.
Perhaps what I find most attractive were the puppets, the Wayangs. They were really beautiful, stylish, distinct, and exotic. It was evident that there were made with thoroughness, looking particularly for aesthetic, combining beauty, skills, art and tradition.  


In ancient Greece and ancient Rome clay dolls, and a few of ivory, dated from around 500 BC, were found in children's tombs. These dolls had articulated arms and legs, some of which had an iron rod extending up from the tops of their heads. This rod was used to manipulate the doll from above, as it is done today in Sicilian puppetry. A few of these dolls had strings in place of rods. Some researchers believe these ancient figures were simply toys and not puppets, due to their small size. 

Italy is considered by many to be the early home of the marionette due to the influence of Roman puppetry. The Christian church used marionettes to perform morality plays. Comedy was introduced to the plays as time went by, and ultimately led to a church edict banning puppetry. Puppeteers responded by setting up stages outside cathedrals and became even more ribald and slapstick. Out of this grew the Italian comedy called Commedia dell'arte. Puppets were used at times in this form of theatre and sometimes Shakespeare's plays were performed using marionettes instead of actors. 
In Sicily, the sides of donkey carts are decorated with intricate, painted scenes from the Frankish romantic poems, such as The Song of Roland. These same tales are enacted in traditional puppet theatres featuring hand-made marionettes of wood. In Sicilian this is called "Opira dî pupi", or "Opera of the puppets". The opera of the puppets and the Sicilian tradition of cantastorî, or "sing stories", are rooted in the Provençal troubadour tradition, in Sicily during the reign of Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, in the first half of the 13th century. 
The eighteenth century was a vital period in the development of all Italian theatre, including the marionette theatre. The rod puppet was mainly of lower-class origin, but the marionette theatre was popular in aristocratic circles, as a celebration of the Age of Enlightenment. The effects, and the artful and complex construction of the puppets, the puppet theatres, and the puppet narratives, were all popular, particularly in Venice. 

The traditional British Punch and Judy puppetry traces its roots to the 16th century to the Italian commedia dell'arte. The character of "Punch" derives from the character Pulcinella, which was Anglicized to Punchinello. He is a manifestation of the Lord of Misrule and Trickster, figures of deep-rooted mythologies. Punch's wife was originally "Joan", but later became "Judy". In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, the familiar Punch and Judy puppet show which existed in Britain was performed in an easily-transportable booth. 

Many regional variants of Pulcinella were developed as the character spread across Europe. In the Netherlands it is Jan Klaassen (and Judy is Katrijn); in Denmark Mester Jackel; in Russia Petrushka; in Romania Vasilache; and in France Polichinelle. Only during the French revolution were puppet booths closed. Those puppeteers who dared to take part in political criticism were imprisoned. In Russia, the Central Puppet Theatre in Moscow and its branches in every part of the country enhanced the reputation of the puppeteer and puppetry in general. 
There is a long tradition of puppetry in Germany and Austria. Much of it derives from the 16th century tradition of the Italian commedia dell'arte. The German version of the British character of 'Punch' is called Kasperle of Kaspar while Judy is called Grete. In the eighteenth century, operas were specifically composed for marionette puppets. 



Marionette puppet theatre has had a very long history in entertainment in Prague, and elsewhere in the Czech Republic. It can be traced deep into the early part of the Middle Ages. Marionettes first appeared around the time of the Thirty Years' War. An important puppet organisation is the National Marionette Theatre in Prague. Its repertoire mainly features a marionette production of Mozart's famous Don Giovanni. The production has period costumes and a beautifully designed eighteenth century setting. Puppets have been used extensively in animated films since 1946. 
Throughout this period, puppetry developed separately from the emerging mainstream of actor theatres, and the 'ragged' puppeteers performed outside of theatre buildings at fairs, markets etc - continuing to be classified along with bandits and gypsies. In the 19th century, puppetry faced competition from other forms of theatre such as vaudeville and music hall, but it adapted to these challenges, for example: by developing stage acts and participating in the new forms of popular theatre, or reinventing itself in other ways and finding audiences at the newly fashionable seaside resorts. 


Sub-Saharan Africa may have inherited some of the puppet traditions of Ancient Egypt. Certainly, secret societies in many African ethnic groups still use puppets (and masks) in ritual dramas as well as in their healing and hunting ceremonies. Today, puppetry continues as a popular form, often within a ceremonial context, and as part of a wide-range of folk forms including dance, storytelling, and masked perfomance. 
Throughout rural Africa, puppetry still performs the function of transmitting cultural values and ideas that in large African cities is increasingly undertaken by formal education, books, cinema, and television. 
We were also introduced to the Mali’s Puppetry by Hadi. 


A puppeteer is a person who manipulates an inanimate object—a puppet—in real time to create the illusion of life. The puppeteer may be visible to or hidden from the audience. A puppeteer can operate a puppet indirectly by the use of strings, rods, wires, electronics or directly by his or her own hands placed inside the puppet or holding it externally. Some puppet styles require puppeteers to work together as a team to create a single puppet character. 
There are a wide range of styles of puppetry but whatever the style, the puppeteer's role is to manipulate the physical object in such a manner that the audience believes the object is imbued with life. In some instances the persona of the puppeteer is also an important feature. 
The relationship between the puppeteer and the puppet-maker is often assumed to be similar to that between an actor and a playwright. This may be so, but one of the characteristics of puppetry is that very often the puppeteer assumes the joint roles of puppet-maker, director,designer, writer and performer. In this case a puppeteer is a more complete theatre practitioner than is the case within other theatre forms. 

Ventriloquism, or ventriloquy, is an act of stagecraft in which a person (a ventriloquist) manipulates his or her voice so that it appears that the voice is coming from elsewhere, usually a puppeteered "dummy". The act of ventriloquism is ventriloquizing, and the ability to do so is commonly called in English the ability to "throw" one's voice. However, the term "throwing one's voice" is misleading, because it implies that a sound's physical origin has changed, when really the change has been perceptual and not physical.

martedì 8 febbraio 2011

Second year production

16 January 2010:
Today, 2 weeks to the show, we had the first rehearsal with all the first and second year and we ran through the whole first act. It was quick, everybody were on time and we finished by time. The first act is around 53 min. After the rehearsal we discuss about what we still have to do and Libby gave some notes to the actors.
I’m having a lot of ideas:
- Built a real fence instead of using the picture.
- Using black umbrella to emphasize the funeral.
-

24 January 2010:
In this last week I have been finding chairs for the play and painting them with the colors of the LGBT flag. Libby helped me to find the chairs, she bought the colors and she put me in the condition to start working. The work is almost done; I just have to repaint some chiars. It wasn’t a difficult job at all, but for some aspects it was really challenging since I had to work with Laura and Belen. I like working with other people, I don’t think there is a problem on this.

Now everything is fine, we are ready for the show.

This week is going to be a very busy week for me also because I have a lot of staff to do with other subjects but I want to do my best for this show. This is our show. What we still have to do? Work on how to build the fence and start working on the lobby set.

This evening we had the cue to cue. It was good. Now that we are also building the light, the sound and the projection, everything seems better, great. It’s going to get better.
All the work of each single member are becoming a huge and amazing work-
                                          
26 Jan 2010:
Today we had our first dress rehearsal. We invited Nazim and his advisor group (Avikali and Julie) to come and see us, since they were going to Race Rocks over the weekend. Generally the rehearsal went well; I missed a part because I wasn’t feeling well and I had to leave since I needed to be alone. Furthermore, my presence was not really necessary, so my absence didn’t cause big problems. After the rehearsal they all took a group picture in which I wasn’t because I didn’t know about it and I came back late to listen to Libby’s note. I then took the personal picture, in a second moment, with Mark (who did a great job)! I also listened to Libby’s note since I stayed in the backstage because I wasn’t feeling well.

27 January 2010:
Jack Matthews Day!
Today we had rehearsal too, but we didn’t go through everything. Everybody was really tired at the end of the day and the end of the week was getting closer. Libby decided to work on some weaknesses of the play and who was not involved was free to go. I used this time to work on what to do in the Lobby.
LOBBY:
-          First of all, we will turn off the lobby’s light and set some Christmas light (take them from Samuel).
-          I also prepare some staff to put on the lobby: general information about Ethnodrama/theatre, Tectonic Theatre Project, The Laramie Project.
-          Emily and Amber are going to find a projector so we can project our pictures and bios in a white sheet surrounded by our printed picture, alone and as a group.
-          Working on some other aspects, this is basically what we are going to do.

28 January 2010: Today we had our official dress rehearsal! Not a lot of people came, but still we had spectators.
I don’t want to be too dramatic, but it was a disaster! Apparently, there were some last minute changes on the projections and the changes made the preview day on the lights, sounds and projections, were not updated yet. A lot of crews were late on calling them and sending them. In the boot, there was a moment were Emily lost the control of everything since both people were behaving inappropriately and they were people who shouldn’t have been there and were just creating more confusion.
After the rehearsal, as usual, we all stopped and said our comment. It came out that between all of us, tech crew and actors, there was a lake of concentration and unity. Everybody was thinking about doing their own staff, without considering the atmosphere around them. I personally felt this too and it was such a “miracle” that this came out just the day before the final show.
I’m sure it wasn’t something inevitable, but at least it didn’t happen the day of the show! This is one aspect that makes the show so wonderful the day after.

29 January 2010: The lobby is done!
The way that our entire work came together was amazing. I don’t know exactly what made the show so good, but everything was in harmony; everybody were doing greatly their own job and at the same time looking after each other and making sure that the whole thing was working.
The performances were fantastic, all the crews were good, the set and the tech jobs were great. All the comment we gave each to the others in the past days were put in act. People loved it and everybody interpreted the message we were sending in the right way, in the way we wanted them to archive it.
At the end of the play I cried! I cried because I was happy that it went well, I cried because it was done, I cried because the atmosphere that we create between the theatre students was magic. We all wanted something and we all did our best to make it happen, who more who less, we all did something.
That night I realized that it was crucial for all of us to make a good show. The day before everything sucked and there was a lack of morale; if the show would have went bad, the question would have been: why should I waste energy for something that I’m not sure it would be a success?
I’m happy that it went well because now I’m motivated and in order to feel the same sensation I felt that night, I would give the same energy or even more!

WHAT WENT WELL?
As far as I’m concerned, I had to take care of the set and design. Originally me, Belen and Laura were assigned to this job, but Belen focus specifically on the props, were she did a great job, while me and Laura worked together. We couldn’t split our job, working one person on the set and the other on the backstage because there wasn’t a big job that could have been done in the backstage.
Basically what we had to do was to paint with the LGBT flag colors, all the chairs that would have been used in the stage. Once we find all the materials we needed, a place to paint, we started our job. At first I tried to schedule the time we were going to paint the chairs, but since it was difficult to find a common free time to paint, me and Laura just met randomly and tried to get our work done as soon as possible. I really appreciate her help, also because we saved a lot of time by working together and she was pretty flexible on the fact of not scheduling our time. Sometimes I couldn’t find her in order to work together so I just go ahead with the work, but it was true though that in a way or another, whenever we needed to work together she was available.
Painting the chairs wasn’t all that difficult; of course we had some difficulties by calculating wrongly the time we actually needed to paint the chairs and the time necessary for them to dry. We had to paint again the chairs several time but we solved all the problems we had. It was nice because we were independent in our job and personally, I think it was a good aspect.
By the end of the week before the “hell week” almost all the chairs were dry, so we were kind of done with our main job. In my opinion this was a good aspect for the set team and it s something that we can say it went well.
The day of the show, since I really wanted to realize the idea of the lobby, in collaboration with Emily, we arranged the Lobby. At the end of all, almost everybody helped us by finding the best way to arrange it. I really enjoyed it and finally the lobby design was done.

WHAT WAS CHALENGING?
Even if I really like design I think that everything was challenging because it wasn’t something that I have really experienced before.
First of all I think it was kind of a challenge working in a close contact with Laura. I really like her, there is no problem between us, but I’m really used to work alone or at least with people with either very close to me or with similar ideas with me. I like to be independent and sometime I want so much to realize my ideas that I don’t really work on other people ideas. I mean, me and Laura didn’t really diverged in opinions, but sometimes, since she always agree with me, I felt that I was kind of selfish, carry on with my ideas and kind of excluding her. For sure this wasn’t my aim and later, after the whole play, I had a conversation with her, asking about her opinion on the play and our work; she told me that she enjoyed working with me and she didn’t fell ignored.
Working on the lobby set was not really challenging, but even if I was kind of free for the entire “hell week”, I didn’t come out with an idea or start working on it. At least I’m happy because the last day, Saturday afternoon, I find the time and energy to work on it and I personally think we came out with a great job.

WHAT WOULD I DO DIFFERENTLY?
To be honest, I think the set shouldn’t have been split between two people. It’s true that ours was a “poor” stage and it’s nice to work with other people; but, after all, there were moment that I felt kind of useless because I was done with my job very early and even trying to be involved in the best way in the organization of the play, my presence wasn’t necessary.
I’m aware of the fact that every single person role is important and we all have the freedom to say our comments and get involved but when somebody else already have this role, you feel like you shouldn’t interfere.
After all, it was a good and I feel like I archived a lot from this experience

Bio:
Name: Augusta Itua
Country: Italy

  1. What type of experience do you have with theatre (either through your time at Pearson or more)?
  2. What made you choose to be apart of the theatre program here at Pearson?
  3. What do you want people to know about your characters? *for second years* (If you want you can talk about your favorite character if playing numerous roles)
  4. What is your favorite area of theatre (Stage management, acting, costume design…) and why?
  5. What would you like for this play to achieve?
  6. What would you like the audience to know before seeing this play?

  1. I like theatre; since I was a child I really enjoyed going to watch different plays. In this last year I have been doing theatre at school (especially musical) and since I’m at Pearson I’m really enjoy my theatre class and the program.
  2. As far as I’m concerned I chose to be part of the theatre program here at Pearson because of my past experience with theatre (answer n° 1).
  1. I really like different area of theatre; personally I like acting, at the same time I really enjoy generally working on a play, in order to make it better. In this specific case I’m enjoying my role on doing the set even if, since we don’t have so much work to do on the stage, I don’t have a lot of work and I can’t really do something. This is also a reason why in this play I would like to continue my job with the set by working on the lobby.
  2. For sure I would like us all to do a great job and be satisfied of our job. Also the idea of working in collaboration with the second years, I think is something really challenging. It’s would also want the audience to receive the message of the play.
  3. I think that the audience should be introduced to the play in order to get better and easier the message of the play. Since we are going to use symbolism in the play, it would be nice though to introduce our symbols to the audience. 

SOUNDTRACKS:
Song of Wyoming - John Denver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGahh8JQFCk
Gee Baby Ain't I Good To You - Louis Armstrong http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYX7sYKrEEo
Wagon Wheel - Old Crow Medicine Show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yswz5MtGey0
The Funeral - Band of Horses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMFWFhTFohk
Loser - Beck http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsCAy9ErdKY
Fragile - Sting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB6a-iD6ZOY
Fix You - Coldplay http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY9b6jgbNyc
3055 - Olafur Arnalds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6u5D-5LWSg
Hallelujah - K.d. Lang http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJlFAcSaoSY

..more about..

Ethnodrama / Ethnotheatre
Ethnodrama is a modern theatrical influence based in reality—it fuses elements of documentary with narrative, in order to portray an issue or event usually of social or political import. The Laramie Project employs many of the rhetorical devices of ethnodrama, as well as newspaper theatre, a subcategory of ethnodrama. In this vein, The Laramie Project takes all of its dialogue from candid interviews, as well as media releases and news pieces. It is as informative as it is compelling, and it achieves its goal of truthfully portraying the people of a small American town, while simultaneously providing an unbiased account of one of the most controversial and influential media events of the 1990’s and beyond.
Sensing the impending significance of the Matthew Shepard case, the New York-based Tectonic Theatre Project traveled to Laramie several times in order to document the event during and after the height of the media frenzy surrounding it. The Laramie Project is the product of their work, and it is generally considered to be one of the most important contributions to the contemporary Western theatrical canon.
While Matthew sacrificed that night in Laramie, his actions and bravery led to the global ripple effect that would incontrovertibly change the world for ensuing generations. 

TECTONIC THEATER PROJECT
Tectonic Theatre Project is an award-winning company whose plays have been performed around the world.  The company is dedicated to developing innovative works that explore theatrical language and form, fostering an artistic dialogue with our audiences on the social, political and human issues that affect us all.  In service to this goal, Tectonic supports readings, workshops, and full theatrical productions, as well as training for students around the country in our play-making techniques.
Tectonic Theater Project was founded in 1991 by Moisés Kaufman and Jeffrey LaHoste.  Tectonic refers to the art and science of structure and was chosen to emphasize the company's interest in construction-- how things are made, and how they might be made differently.
Its groundbreaking plays, THE LARAMIE PROJECT, Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde, and I am my own wife, have sparked national discourse about their subjects and have inspired artists and audiences worldwide.  
In the early years of Tectonic, the company staged works by writers who were testing the boundaries of the theatrical form:  Samuel Beckett, Franz Xaver Kroetz, Sophie Treadwell and Naomi Iizuka.  in time, however, Kaufman realized that in order to be rigorous about exploring theatrical form, the company had to deal with the issue of text.  Thus, he set about writing his first play, Gross Indecency, based on transcripts, biographies, letters and other found materials about the life and work of Oscar Wilde.
 Tectonic followed Gross Indecency with another bold experiment in form: THE LARAMIE PROJECT.  One month after the murder of gay University of Wyoming student Matthew Shepard, Kaufman and ten company members traveled to Laramie, Wyoming to interview people in the town torn apart by the crime.  The play forged from these interviews was created collaboratively by the members of the company over a long workshop process in which participants were encouraged to operate outside their area of specialization.  Thus, actors and designers became writers and dramaturges, directors became designers and actors, and the company uncovered a new way of creating a theatrical event.
Tectonic continues to employ these techniques in creating some of the most unique and innovative works on the American stage.  

THE LARAMIE PROJECT
In October 1998 Matthew Shepard was kidnapped, severely beaten and left to die, tied to a fence on the outskirts of Laramie, Wyoming.  Five weeks later, Moisés Kaufman and fellow members of the Tectonic Theater Project went to Laramie and over the course of the next year, conducted more than 200 interviews with people of the town, company members' own journal entries and published news reports.
From these interviews they wrote the play The Laramie Project, a chronicle of the life of the town of Laramie in the year after the murder.  It is divided into three acts, and eight actors portray more than sixty characters in a series of short scenes.
Ten years after Shepard's murder, members of the Tectonic Theater Project returned to Laramie to conduct follow-up interviews with residents featured in the play. Those interviews were turned into a companion piece, entitled The Laramie Project: Ten Years Later. The Laramie project is one of the most performed plays in America today.
The hate crime committed against Matthew Shepard in Laramie generated a worldwide response in support of social and legal equality, regardless of sexual orientation. While the perpetrators, Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson, were convicted and imprisoned for their actions, their crime was not categorized as one fueled by hate, mainly due to insufficient legislation at a Federal level, as well as in the state of Wyoming.
However, more than a decade after their sentencing, U.S. Congress passed the controversial Matthew Shepard Act into legislation on October 22nd, 2009, and it was signed by President Barack Obama into law on October 28th of that same year. It expands the definition of a hate crime to include sexual orientation nationwide.